Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Morals and Intelligence :: essays research papers fc
MORALS AND INTELLIGENCEThe United States mustiness maintain the highest precedent of morals during intelligence information missionary stations. There are many ways that instruction from intelligence missions can be compromised, and far to many ways that the members of the mission teams can be exploited. Due to the risk of allowing ones egotism or the mission to be compromised, a high moral skipper and mortalal standard should be ever present when accomplishing intelligence missions.The graduation issue dealing with morals and intelligence is finding the right person(s) to shoot a mission. There must be a train of genuine integrity present if a person is to successfully complete missions without jeopardizing the study collected. The Mossad (Israeli Intelligence) has made a practice of finding and exploiting personnel that work or so classified information as well as those in the pip to observe the behavior of said personnel (Thomas 33). Intelligence agencies around the globe look for behavioral patterns in an individuals character. For instance, if a person drinks too much, desires expensive things, or is a sexual deviant thither is a possibility that, with the proper motivation, the information they have been entrusted with could be revealed.a nonher(prenominal) problem when dealing with intelligence operations is that during an operation the agent is not allowed to collect, analyze, or disseminate any information that may be unintentionally collected on a United States citizen. When the United States Marine corps collects intelligence for operations on military bases with aerial photography, there must be expressed written permission by neighboring communities that may be photographed in conjunction with the collection methods (OpsO VMU-1). There are time when intelligence is collected while in training areas that bordering communities may be depicted as well. These individual families or businesses must each sanction of being possibly view ed during surveillance, as long as they are not the actual target of the intelligence gathering operation. The same rules of engagement apply while in combat situations. The morality of secret operations has been questioned since intelligence first began. The President of the United States must decide at the highest level which secret operations should be conducted and which are not ethical. The problem that has happened in the past is that the President has looked at the Director of Central Intelligence as his personal advisor when it comes to advising on intelligence affairs (Johnson 292). President Kennedy looked to his crony Bobby when making decisions of national security, and President Reagan set up his personal friend, Walter Clark, as his National Security Advisor.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.