The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms Essay -- Gun Bear Arms C

The act Amendment And The Right To knuckle under ArmsThroughout the years in that location has been an ongoing debate over the heartbeat Amendment and how it should be understand. The issue that is universe debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this be the case, one must also think about what muckle the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There ar two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in advance of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus unless lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals rile to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law these citizens make up a great majorit y of the opposing side of this argument. These people contest that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle beledge (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The last outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights statesA well-regulated Militia, being incumbent to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and go for Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791)This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendments militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects th e states rights to be able to maintain unionized military units. These people argue that the Second Amendment was merely used to devote the states organized military forces beyond the federal governments ply to be able to disarm them. This would guarantee that the states would always have enough force at their command to abolish federal restraints on their rights and to bear by arms if necessary. T... ... stricter gun control, the states are moving in a different direction. The reason behind this action is that the constitutionality of tighter gun control laws is meet a question. Once the Supreme Court of the United States answers this question on the legality of infringing on the right to bear arms we will know what our exact right is.Works Cited1 Cottrol, Robert, ed. hero sandwich Control and the Constitution Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment. New York Garland Publishing Inc., 19942 Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and weather Arms in State Bills of Rig hts and Judicial Interpretation. SAF 19933 Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut Quorum Books, 1989 4 Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia University Press of Virginia, 19915 Kruschke, Earl PHD. Gun Control A Reference Handbook. California ABC-CLIO Inc., 19956 Image on the dig page taken from TIME. Photographer unknown.7 Prune Yard Shopping piazza v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980)8 Zimring, Franklin E., Gun Control. Encyclopedia Encarta 1993-1997 Microsoft Corporation.