Indian contract act Essay

A prospectus issued by a comp each for subscription of its shares by the members of the public, is an invitation to offer. The Letter of Offer issued by a comp each to its existing shareowners is an offer. 5. The offer moldiness be communicated to the offeree. An offer essential be communicated to the offeree soonerhand it can be sure. This is true of specific as sell as general offer. 6. The offer must not inpatienttain a term the non-compliance of which whitethorn be as nubed to count to sufferance. Cross OffersWhere two parties make identical offers to severally early(a), in ignorance of each others offer, the offers are known as cross-offers and neither of the two can be called an acceptance of the other and, therefore, there is no hale.TERMINATION OR LAPSE OF AN OFFERAn offer is made with a view to obtain assent thereto. As soon as the offer is accepted it becomes a contract. But before it is accepted, it may lapse, or may be revoked. Also, the offeree may reject the offer. In these disciplines, the offer volition come to an end. 1) The offer lapses after stipulated or well-founded time2) An offer lapses by the death or insanity of the offeror or the offeree before acceptance. 3) An offer terminates when rejected by the offeree.4) An offer terminates when revoked by the offeror before acceptance. 5) An offer terminates by not being accepted in the mode prescribed, or if no mode is prescribed, in several(prenominal) regular and reasonable manner. 6) A conditional offer terminates when the condition is not accepted by the offeree. (7) Counter OfferTERMINATION OF AN OFFER1. An offer lapses after stipulated or reasonable time.2. An offer lapses by the death or insanity of the offeror or the offeree before acceptance. 2. An offer lapses on rejection. 4. An offer terminates when revoked.5. It terminates by counter-offer.6. It terminates by not being accepted in the mode prescribed or in usual and reasonable manner. 7. A conditional offer termina tes when condition isnot accepted. acceptanceAcceptance has been defined as When the soulfulness to whom the project is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is give tongue to to be accepted. Acceptance how madeThe offeree is deemed to have disposed his acceptance when he gives his assent to the proposal. The assent may be run or implied. It is express when the acceptance has been signified either in writing, or by word of mouth, or by instruction execution of some required act. Ex- A enters into a bus for going to his destination and takes a seat. From the very nature, of the circumstance, the law will imply acceptance on the part of A. In the fountain of a general offer, it can be accepted by eitherone by complying with the terms of the offer. ESSENTIALS OF A VALID ACCEPTANCE1) Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.2) Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror.3) Acceptance must be according to the mode prescribed.Ex- A sends an offer to B through post in the usual course. B should make the acceptance in the usual and reasonable manner as no mode of acceptance is prescribed. He may accept the offer by sending a garner, through post, in the ordinary course, within a reasonable time. COMMUNICATION OF OFFER, ACCEPTANCE AND REVOCATIONAs mentioned earlier that in order to be a well-grounded offer and acceptance. (i) the offer must be communicated to the offeree, and(ii) the acceptance must be communicated to the offeror.The communication of acceptance is complete(i) as against the proposer, when it is put into a course of transmission to him, so as to be out of the violence of the acceptor (ii) as against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. Ex-A proposes, by letter, to sell a ho wasting disease to B at a certain price. B accepts As proposal by a letter sent by post. The communication of acceptance is complete (i) as against A, when the letter is posted by B (ii) as against B, when the letter is received by A. The communication of a revocation (of an offer or an acceptance) is complete (1) as against the mortal who makesit, when it is put into a course of transmission to the individual to whom it is made, so as to be out of the power of the person who makes it. (2) as against the person to whom it is made when it comes to his knowledge. Ex-A revokes his proposal by telegram. The revocation is complete as against A, when the telegram is dispatched. It is complete as against B, when B receives it. Revocation of proposal and acceptanceA proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterward. Ex-A proposes, by a letter sent by post, to sell his house to B. B accepts the proposal by a letter sent by post. A may revoke his proposal at any time before or at the moment when B posts his letter of acceptance, but not afterwards. B may revoke his acceptance at any time before or at the moment when the letter communi cating it reaches A, but not afterwards.2.3 CAPACITY TO CONTRACT( scratchs 10-12)WHO ARE NOT COMPETENT TO CONTRACTThe following are considered as incompetent to carry, in the eye of law (1) Minor (i) A contract with or by a minor is void and a minor, therefore, cannot, bind himself by a contract. (ii) A minors consentment cannot be ratified by the minor on his attaining majority. (iii) If a minor has received any usefulness under a void contract, he cannot be asked to refund the same. (iv) A minor cannot be a partner in a partnership firm.(v) A minors estate is liable to a person who supplies necessaries of life to a minor. CASE EXAMPLEIn 1903 the Privy Council in the leading case of Mohiri Bibi v. Dharmodas Ghose (190,30 Ca. 539) held that in India minors contracts are absolutely void and not merely voidable. The lawsuits of the case wereDharmodas Ghose, a minor, entered into a contract for borrowing a sum of Rs. 20,000 out of which the lender paid the minor a sum of Rs. 8,0 00. The minorexecuted mortgage of property in favour of the lender. Subsequently, the minor sued for setting diversion the mortgage. The Privy Council had to ascertain the sensibleity of the mortgage. Under Section 7 of the Transfer of Property Act, every person competent to contract is competent to mortgage. The Privy Council trenchant that Sections 10 and 11 of the Indian Contract Act make the minors contract void. The mortgagee prayed for refund of Rs. 8,000 by the minor. The Privy Council further held that as a minors contract is void, any money advanced to a minor cannot be recovered. (2) Mental IncompetenceA person is said to be of unsound mind for the purpose of making a contract, if at the time when he makes it, he is incapable of understanding it, and of forming a rational shrewdness as to its effect upon his interests. A person, who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionally of sound mind, may make a contract when he is of sound mind. Ex- A patient, in a lunatic asyl um, who is at intervals, of sound mind may contract during those intervals. A sane man, who is delirious from fever or who is so intoxicated that he cannot understand the terms of a contract or form a rational judgement as to its effect on his interest, cannot contract whilst such(prenominal)(prenominal) delirium or drunkenness lasts. (3) Incompetence through Status(i) Alien Enemy (Political Status)(ii) Foreign Sovereigns and Ambassadors(iii) Company under the Companies Act or Statutory bow window by passing Special Act of Parliament (Corporate status) (iv) Insolvent Persons2.4 FREE CONSENT(Sections 10 13-22)What is the meaning of CONSENT (SECTION 13)When two or more persons agree upon the same thing in the same hotshot, they are said to consent.Ex-agrees to sell his Fiat Car 1983 model for Rs. 80,000. B agrees to buy the same. There is a valid contract since A and B have consented to the same subject topic. What is meant by Free Consent(i) A railway company refuses to deliver certain goods to the consignee, pull up upon the payment of an il legitimate charge for carriage. The consignee pays the sum charged in order to obtain the goods. He is entitle to recover so much of the charge as was illegally excessive. (ii) The directors of a Tramway Co. issued a prospectus stating that they had the just to run tramcars with steam power instead of with horses as before. In fact, the Act incorporating the company provided that such power might be used with the sanction of the Board of Trade. But, the Board of Trade refused to give permission and the company had to be wound up. P, a share holder sued the directors for damages for fraud. The House of Lords held that the directors were not liable in fraud because they honestly believed what they said in the prospectus to be true. Derry v. Peek (1889) 14 A.C. 337. 2.5 CONSIDERATIONSections 2(d), 10,23-25, 148, 185 translationConsideration is what a promisor demands as the price for his promise. In simple words, it me ans something in return. Consideration has been defined as When at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or promises to abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.IMPORTANCE OF CONSIDERATIONA promise without consideration is purely gratuitous and, however sacred and cover in honour it may be, cannot create a legal obligation. A person who makes a promise to do or abstain from doing something usually does so as a return or equiva bestow of some loss, damage, or inconvenience that may have been occasioned to the other party in respect of the promise. The return so received and the loss, damage or inconvenience so caused is regarded in law as the consideration for the promise. KINDS OF CONSIDERATIONA consideration may be1. Executed or Present2. Executory or Future2. Past2.6 LEGALITY OF OBJECT(Sections 23, 24)An promi se will not be enforceable if its object or the consideration is unlawful. According to Section 23 of the Act, the consideration and the object of an agreement are unlawful in the following cases What consideration and objects are unlawful agreement VOID 1. If it is forbidden by law2. If it is of such a nature that if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law. 2. If it is fraudulent. An agreement with a view to defraud other is void. 4. If it involves or implies tarnish to the person orproperty of another. If the object of an agreement is to injure the person or property of another it is void. 5. If the Court regards it as degraded or opposed to public policy. An agreement, whose object or consideration is immoral or is opposed to the public policy, is void. Ex-A partnership entered into for the purpose of doing business in arrack (local alcoholic drink) on a licence granted only to one of the partners, is void ab-initio whether the partnership was entered into before the licence was granted or afterwards as it involved a transfer of licence, which is forbidden and penalised by the Akbari Act and the rules thereunder Velu Payaychi v. Siva Sooriam, AIR (1950) Mad. 987.2.7 VOID and VOIDABLE agreements(Sections 26-30)Void agreement1. The following are the additional grounds declaring agreements as void (i) Agreements by person who are not competent to contract.(ii) Agreements under a mutual mistake of fact material to the agreement. (iii) Agreement with unlawful consideration.(iv) Agreement without consideration. (Exception if such an agreement is in writing and registered or for a past consideration) (v) Agreement in restraint of marriage.(vi) Agreement in restraint of trade(vii) Agreements in restrain of legal proceedings,(viii) Agreements void for uncertainty (Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain) (ix) Agreements by way of wager (a promise to give money or moneys worth upon the determination or asce rtainment of an uncertain event) (x) Agreements against Public Policy(xi) Agreements to do impossible act.Voidable agreementsAn agreement, which has been entered into by misrepresentation, fraud, coercion is voidable, at the option of the aggrieved party. 2.8 CONTINGENT CONTRACTS(SECTIONS 31-36)A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract does or does not happen. When a contingent contract may be enforced dependent upon(p) contracts may be enforced when that uncertain future event has happened. If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A CONTINGENT CONTACT1. There must be a valid contract.2. The performance of the contract must be conditional.3. The even must be uncertain.4. The event must be collateral to the contact.5. The event must be an act of the party.6. The event should not be the discretion of the promisor.2.9 QUASI CONTRACTSSECTIONS 68- 72The term quasi contract may be defined as a contract which resembles that created by a contract. as a matter of fact, quasi contract is not a contract in the strict sense of the term, because there is no real contract in existence. Moreover, there is no intention of the parties to enter into a contract. It is an obligation, which the law creates in the absence of any agreement. chance OF QUASI CONTRACTSFollowing are to be deemed Quasi-contracts.(i) Claim for Necessaries Supplied to a person incapable of Contracting or on his account. (ii) Reimbursement of person paying money callable by another in fee of which he is interested. Obligation of a person enjoying benefits of non-gratuitous act. (iii) Responsibility of Finder of Goods(iv) Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered by mistake or under coercion Ex-A, who supplies the wife and children of B, a lunatic, with necessaries suitable to their conditions in life, is authorise to be reimbursed from Bs property. 2.10 work outANCE OF CONTR ACTSSECTIONS 37-67Offer to perform or tender of performance According to Section 38, if a valid offer/tender is made and is not accepted by the promisee, the promisor shall not be responsible for non-performance nor shall he lose his rights under the contract. A tender or offer of performance to be valid must satisfy the following conditions 1. It must be unconditional.2. It must be made at proper time and place, and performed in the agreed manner. WHO MUST PERFORMPromisor The promise may be performed by promisor himself, or his agent or by his legal representative. Agent the promisor may practice a competent person to perform it. Legal Representative In case of death of the promisor, the Legal representative must perform the promise unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.CONTRACTS, WHICH NEED NOT BE PERFORMEDI. If the parties mutually agree to substitute the original contract by a new one or to rescind or alter it 2. If the promisee dispenses with or remits, whol ly or in part the performance of the promise made to him or extends the time for such performance or accepts any satisfaction for it. 2. If the person, at whose option the contract is voidable, rescinds it. 4. If the promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of his promise. 2.11 DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTSSections 73-75The cases in which a contract is discharged may be classified as follows A. By performance or tenderB. By mutual consentA contract may terminate by mutual consent in any of the following shipway a. Novation (substitution)b. Recession (cancellation)c. AlterationC. By subsequent impossibilityD. By surgical process of lawE. By breach2.12 REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT(SECTIONS 73-75)As soon as either party commits a breach of the contract, the other party becomes entitled to any of the following reliefs a) Recession of the contractb) Damages (monetary compensation)c) Specific performanced) Injunctione) Quantum meruitEx A, a singer contracts with B, the manager of a theatre, to sing at his theatre for two nights in every week during the next two months, and B engages to pay her Rs. 100 for each nights performance. On the 6th night, A wilfully absents herself from the theatre and B in consequence, rescinds the contract. B is entitled to claim compensation for the damages for which he has sustained through the non-fulfilment of the contract. 2.13 CONTRACTS OF INDEMNITYSECTIONS 124-125What is contract of indemnityA contract of indemnity is a contract whereby one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other party. A contract of indemnity may arise either (1) by an express promise or (2) by operation of law i.e. the duty of a head to indemnify an agent from consequences of all lawful acts done by him as an agent. RIGHTS OF INDEMNIFIED (THE INDEMNITY HOLDER)The indemnity holder is entitled to recover from the promisor a) All the damages which may be compelled to pay in any suit in respect of any matter to which the promise to indemnify applies b) All costs of suit which he may have to pay to such third party provided in bringing or defending the suit (i) he acted under the chest of the indemnifier or (ii) he did not act in contravention of the orders of the indemnifier and in such a such as a prudent man would act in his own case. c) All sums which he may have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such suit, if the compromise was not contrary to the orders of the indemnifier, and was one which it would have been prudent for the promisee to make. RIGHTS OF INDEMNIFIERThe Contract Act makes no mention of the rights of the indemnifier. It has been held in Jaswant Singh Vs. Section of State 14 Bom 299 that the indemnifier becomes entitled to the benefit of all the securities, which the creditor has against the wiz debtor whether he was aware of them, or not. 2.14 CONTRACT OF GUARANTEESECTION 1 26What is Contract of GuaranteeA contract of guarantee is defined as a contract to perform the promise or discharge the liability or a third person in case of his default. The person who gives the guarantee is called the Surety, the person from whom the guarantee is given is called the Principal Debtor and the person to whom the guarantee I given is called the Creditor. extremity of two contractsIt must be noted that in a contract of guarantee there must, in effect be two contracts, (i) a principal contract the principal debtor and the creditor and (ii) a secondary contract the creditor and the security.Ex When A requests B to lend Rs. 10,000 to C and guarantees that C will repay the amount within the agreed time and that on C failing to do so, he will himself pay to B, there is a contract of guarantee. Essential and legal rules for a valid contract of guarantee(i) The contract of guarantee must satisfy the requirements of a valid contract (ii) There must be individual primari ly liable(iii) The promise to pay must be conditionalKinds of guarantee(i) Specific Guarantee(ii) Continuing GuaranteeRIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CREDITORRightsThe creditor is entitled to demand payment from the surety as soon as theprincipal debtor refuses to pay or makes default in payment. ObligationsThe obligations of a creditor are1) Not to change any terms of the Original Contract.2) Not to compound, or give time to, or agree not to sue the Principal Debtor 3) Not to do any act inconsistent with the rights of the surety RIGHTS OF SURETYRights of a surety may be classified under three heads1. Rights against the CreditorIn case of fidelity guarantee, the surety can direct creditor to dismiss the employee whose honesty he has guaranteed, in the event of proved dishonesty of the employee. 2. Rights against the Principal Debtor(a) Right of Subrogation (stepping into the shoes of the original) Where a surety has paid the guaranteed debt on its becoming due or has performed the gua ranteed duty on the default of the principal debtor, he is invested with all the rights, which the creditor has against the debtor. (b) Right to be indemnifiedThe surety has the right to recover from the principal debtor, the amounts which he has rightfully paid under the contract of guarantee. 2. Rights of ContributionWhere a debt has been guaranteed by more than one person, they are called as co-sureties. When a surety has paid more than his share, he has a right of contribution from the other sureties who are equally bound to pay with him. LIABILITIES OF SURETYThe liability of a surety is called as secondary or contingent, as his liability arises only on default by the principal debtor. But as soon as the principal debtor defaults, the liability of the surety begins and runs co-extensive with the liability of the principal debtor, in the sense that the surety will be liable for all those sums for which the principal debtor is liable. The creditor may file a suit against the suret y without suing the principal debtor. Where the creditor holds securities from the principal debtor for his debt, the creditor need not first exhaust his remedies against the securities before suing the surety, unless the contractspecifically so provides. DISCHARGE OF SURETY1. By notice of revocation2. By death of surety2. By variance in terms of contract4. By release or discharge of Principal Debtor5. By compounding with, or giving time to, or agreeing not to sue, Principal Debtor 6. By creditors act or omission impairing Suretys eventual remedy 7. Loss of Security2.15 CONTRACT OF BAILMENT AND PLEDGE BAILMENTSECTIONS 148 181What is BailmentWhen one person delivers some goods to another person under a contract for a specified purpose and when that specified purposes is accomplished the goods shall be delivered to the first person, it is known as Bailment The person delivering the goods is called the Bailor, and the person to whom goods are delivered is called the Bailee. CHARACTERIS TICS OF BAILMENT1. Delivery of Goods it may be express or constructive (implied). 2. Contract.2. Return of goods in specie.KINDS OF BAILMENTSBailment may be classified as follows 1. stay Delivery of goods by one man to another to keep for the use of the bailor. 2. Commodatum Goods lent to friend gratis (free of charge) to be used by him. 2. Hire Goods lent to the bailee for hire, i.e., in return for payment of money. 4. Pawn or Pledge Deposit of goods with another by way of security for money borrowed. 5. Delivery of goods for being transported by the bailee for reward. DUTIES OF BAILOR1. To disclose faults in the goods2. Liability for breach of stock warrant as to title.2. To bear expenses in case of Gratuitous bailments4. In case of non-gratuitous bailments, the bailor is held responsible to bear only extra-ordinary expenses. Ex-A horse is lent for a journey. The ordinary expenses like feeding the horse etc., shall be borne by the bailee but in case horse move ill, the mo ney spent in his treatment will be regarded as an extra-ordinary expenditure and borne by the bailor. DUTIES OF THE BAILEE1. To take care of the goods bailed2. Not to make unauthorised use of goods2. Not to Mix Bailors goods with his own4. To return the goods bailed5. To return any accretion to the goods bailedRIGHTS OF BAILEE1. The bailee can sue bailor for(a) claiming compensation for damage resulting from non-disdosure of faults in the goods (b) for breach of warranty as to title and the damage resulting therefrom and (c) for extraordinary expenses.2. Lien2. Rights against wrongful deprivation of injury to goodsRIGHTS OF THE BAILOR1. The bailor can enforce by suit all duties or liabilities of the bailee. 2. In case of gratuitous bailment (i.e., bailment without reward), the bailor can demand their return whenever he pleases, even though he lent it for a specified time or purpose. TERMINATION OF BAILMENT1. On the destruction of the stipulated period.2. On the accomplishment of th e specified purpose.2. By bailees act inconsistent with conditions.FINDER OF LOST GOODSFinding is not keeping. A finder of lost goods is treated as the bailee of the goods found as such and is charged with the responsibilities of a bailee, besides the responsibility of exercising reasonable efforts in finding the real owner. However, he enjoys certain rights also. His rights are summed up hereunder 1. Right to retain the goods2. Right to Sell -the finder may sell it(1) when the thing is in danger of perishing or of losing the greater part of its value (2) when the lawful charges of the finder in respect of the thing found, amount to 2/3rd of its value. 2.16 PLEDGEA pledge is the bailment of goods as security for payment of debt or performance of a promise. The person who delivers the goods, as security is called the pledgor and the person to whom the goods are so delivered is called the pledgee. The ownership cadaver with the pledgor. It is only a qualified property that passes to the pledgee. Delivery Essential A pledge is created only when the goods are delivered by the borrower to the lender or to someone on his behalf with the intention of their being treated as security against the advance. Delivery of goods may, however, be actual or constructive. 2.17 CONTRACT OF AGENCYSECTION 182 238Who is an AgentAn agent is defined as a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third person. In other words, an agent is a person who acts in place of another. The person for whom or on whose behalf he acts is called the Principal. Agency is therefore, a relation based upon an express or implied agreement whereby one person, the agent, is authorised to act for another, his principal, in transactions with third person. The function of an agent is to bring about contractual relations amongst the principal and third parties.WHO CAN EMPLOY AN factorAny person, who is capable to contract may appoint as agent. Thus, a minor or lun atic cannot contract through an agent since they cannot contract themselves personally either. WHO MAY BE AN AGENTIn considering the contract of agency itself (i.e., the relation between principal and agent), the contractual capacity of the agent becomes important. HOW AGENCY IS CREATEDA contract of agency may be created by in any of the following three ways (1) Express Agency(2) Implied Agency(3) Agency by Estoppel(4) Agency by Holding Out(5) Agency of Necessity(6) Agency By RatificationDUTIES OF AGENT1. To conduct the business of agency according to the principals directions 2. The agent should conduct the business with the skill and diligence that is generally possessed by persons act in similar business, except where the principal knows that the agent is wanting in skill. 3. To render proper accounts.4. To use all reasonable diligence, in communicating with his principal, and in seeking to obtain his instructions. 5. Not to make any secret profits6. Not to deal on his own acco unt7. Agent not entitled to wages for business misconducted. 8. An agent should not disclose confidential information supplied to him by the principal Weld Blundell v. Stephens (1920) AC. 1956. 9. When an agency is terminated by the principal dying or becoming of unsound mind, the agent is bound to take on behalf of the representatives of his late principal, all reasonable steps for the protection and preservation of the interests entrusted to him. RIGHTS OF AN AGENT1. Right to remuneration2. Right Of Retainer2. Right of Lien4. Right of Indemnification5. Right to compensation for injury caused by principals neglectPRINCIPALS DUTIES TO AGENTA principal is(i) bound to indemnify the agent against the consequences of all lawful acts done by such agent in exercise of the authority conferred upon him (ii) liable to indemnify an agent against the consequences of an act done in good faith. (iii) The principal must make compensation to his agent in respect of injury caused to such agent by the principals neglect or want of skill.TERMINATION OF AGENCY1. By revocation by the Principal.2. On the expiry of fixed period of time.2. On the performance of the specific purpose.4. Insanity or Death of the principal or Agent.5. An agency shall also terminate in case subject matter is either destroyed or rendered unlawful.6. Insolvency of the Principal. Insolvency of the principal, not of the agent, terminates the agency. 7. By renunciation of agency by the Agent.